Nanotechnology Meets Cancer 

 

4:00PM  Nanodevices For Cancer Therapy
Shiladitya Sengupta, PhD, Assistant Professor of Medicine and Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, shiladit@mit.edu

Moderator: Jose Miguel Trevejo, MD, PhD, Senior Scientist, Biomedical Engineering Group, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory,  Department of Infectious Disease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, jtrevejo@draper.com

The idea of building structures atom by atom has been around for decades, but only recently have researchers gained the tools to make nanotechnology a reality.  In medicine, there are many opportunities for nanotechnology to improve the care that patients receive.  Nanodevices are already being developed for use as biosensors, as part of imaging systems, and as drug delivery vehicles.  All three of these functions promise to help improve cancer therapy. 

 

Angiogenesis, or the formation of new blood vessels, plays a major role in the development of a tumor.  After a tumor has grown to about the size of a cubic millimeter, its core becomes hypoxic, and it begins to release growth factors to recruit new blood vessels that will supply it with oxygen.  Inhibiting angiogenesis has been investigated as a means of preventing tumor growth but has not proven to be fully successful, for tumor cells cut off from the blood supply can eventually develop “reactive resistance” to hypoxia.  These resistant cancer cells could be killed by chemotherapeutic drugs, but once the vasculature to the tumor has been cut off, there is no way for chemotherapy to be delivered.  Nanotechnology offers a way to deliver chemotherapeutic drugs and anti-angiogenic drugs in the same vehicle so that as the blood supply is shut off, chemotherapy is present to prevent any hypoxia-resistant cells from proliferating.

 

The lab of Shiladitya Sengupta is in the process of developing nanocells capable of delivering both types of drugs.  Each nanocell is between 120 and 200 μm in diameter and can be thought of as “a balloon within a balloon.”  Inside each nanocell is a chemotherapeutic drug covalently bound to a polymer, and on the surface of each cell is a lipid coat containing an anti-angiogenic drug.  The technology makes use of the fact that a tumor’s blood vessels have pores 600 μm in diameter and are much leakier than normal blood vessels, which have pores only around 50 μm in diameter.  The nanocells circulate in the blood, and because of their size, they leak out of blood vessels only in tumors.  Once there, the nanocells are degraded by enzymes produced by the tumor.  Work remains to be done to win clinical approval for the technology, but results from Sengupta’s lab indicate that the nanocells are more effective and less toxic than traditional chemotherapy. 

View this presentation.


5:00PM  Tumor Microenvironment in Cancer Progression and Metastasis
Raghu Kalluri, PhD, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology; Chief, Division of Matrix Biology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, rkalluri@bidmc.harvard.edu

Moderator: Jeffrey Borenstein, PhD, Director, Biomedical Engineering Center; Distinguished Member of the Technical Staff, Charles Stark Draper Laboratory; Program Leader for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering and Draper Laboratory Site Miner, CIMIT, jborenstein@draper.com

Around twenty million people worldwide are diagnosed with cancer every year, and eight to nine million die.  Cancer is much more prevalent, however, than even these numbers suggest.  Many people have cancerous lesions in their bodies but do not become ill and do not seek medical attention.  Based on autopsy studies, for example, it seems that everyone over the age of fifty has small, dormant carcinomas in the thyroid, although less than one percent will present with cancer in the clinic.  Latent carcinomas in the prostate or breast all also commonly observed.   These lesions have many of the features of invasive cancer but do not exhibit invasive behavior.  It seems that the body’s natural defenses, not just the genetic instability of the cancerous cells themselves, determines to what extent a tumor proliferates.     

 

Genetic defects in cancerous cells are not responsible for all the observed variation in their growth rates.  The host environment also plays a role.  One way in which systemic factors might affect cancer proliferation involves the “angiogenic switch concept.”  Angiogenesis can promote tumor growth, yet to some extent, angiogenesis is controlled by regulators that circulate throughout the entire body.  Different people will have different background levels of angiogenic regulators, so some people’s bodies will naturally lie closer to the tipping point where angiogenesis is turned “on.”  Thus, according to this hypothesis, tumors will be more likely to prompt angiogenesis in some people than in others not because of differences amongst the tumors but because of background differences amongst the people.  In mice with cancer, for example, the presence or absence of certain genes responsible for inhibiting endothelial proliferation significantly affects survival.

 

Tumors are not entirely composed of cancerous cells, and researchers still do not know whether non-cancerous cells in a tumor have been recruited to help it grow or whether they are there to contain it.  Fibroblasts, in particular, fulfill mysterious functions.  These cells exhibit marked heterogeneity.  Some inhibit metastasis but not proliferation while others have unknown effects.  The immune system also seems to play an important role in holding back the spread of cancerous cells.  These observations suggest that when considering cancer, one should think about the phase during which there is cancer without disease.  In treating patients, perhaps the goal should be to prolong this phase for as long as possible.  For patients with cancer, perhaps therapy should be focused on restoring the body’s natural checks on proliferation and metastasis, in addition to merely obliterating the cancer and hoping it doesn’t come back.

 

Video not available